| |
 ° |
Fallon
°
Yerington
°
Fernley
° |
|
|

| Total Population 2005 |
44,695 |
| Projected population in 2008 |
45,533 |
| Households making less than $25,000 |
17% |
| Households making $25,000-$49,999 |
25% |
| Households making $50,000-$74,999 |
24% |
| Households making $75,000-$99,000 |
14% |
| Households making more than $100,000 |
20% |
| Median household income |
$58,712 |
| Total Population - under age 18 |
22% |
| Total Population - ages 18-34 |
16% |
| Total Population - ages 35-50 |
22% |
| Total Population - ages 50-64 |
23% |
| Total Population - ages 65 and over |
17% |
| Average commute time in minutes |
25.33 |
| |
Source: 2005-2006 population, income and demographic data is from Claritas. |
|
|

C.W. Dake House, built in 1872
Douglas County
Holler says. “There is a need to be more
aggressive in growth management, but caution
needs to be taken not to ruin the other tools
that are in place that are working to direct and
limit growth.”


There is a way to at least save open space.
While lawyers and judges argue over
this controversial initiative, others look to
alternative methods of preserving open space
in this sprawling county with deep agricultural
roots.
“The only permanent planning tool available
to retain our open spaces and food-growing
places is the placement of conservation
easements,” says Jacques Etchegoyhen,
longtime resident, former county commissioner
and current principal with Terra Firma
Associates, LLC. “It is also the only tool
that keeps the water forever in the emerald
oasis we call home. Any other mechanism
such as Master Planning, zoning, planned
developments, deed restrictions and so on can
be undone far too easily.”
SOMEONE HAS TO DO CROWD
CONTROL
So who oversees the inevitable increase in
crime and traffi c concerns that come with
growth? Douglas County Sheriff Ron Pierini, a
popular elected offi cial in his second term, says
he can always use more offi cers. “We get more calls about traffi c and
congestion than anything, and just dealing
with the amount of complaints we get is time
consuming,” he says. “We do give out about
5,000 citations a year, which requires us to
have more traffi c offi cers out there.”
Pierini says a future ballot question to help
Douglas County fund public safety is probably
inevitable, since projections are that his
department will need 45 additional personnel
during the next fi ve years.
“Our biggest issue is that we cover 750
square miles and three communities — Topaz
Lake, Carson Valley and Lake Tahoe,” he says.
“When I was elected eight years ago, we had
around 35,000 calls a year, and now we’re up
to around 60,000 calls.”
By Linda Hiller
LIKE THE REST OF NEVADA,
DOUGLAS COUNTY IS GROWING.
But how fast or slow that growth should
be is the question. According to the
Nevada State Demographer’s offi ce, the
county population grew 4.8 percent last
year to 50,102, making it one of the
fastest growth counties in Nevada.
“As long as Douglas County continues
to be a desirable place and affordable to
those who have the desire, we are going
to grow,” says County Manager Dan
Holler. “We can see all around us the
‘wrong’ way to grow; we need to be out
in front with good planning.”
County voters agree.
In 2002, 53 percent of voters
approved a grassroots Sustainable
Growth Initiative (SGI), limiting new
home building permits to 280 per year
(the average for 2000-2005 was 555).
“The message we wanted to send
to our commissioners was for them to
stop rubber stamping what seemed like
every development proposal that came
before them,” says Harriet Watters,
who collected SGI signatures in the
beginning. “We just wanted them to
slow down a bit and honor the Master
Plan more.”
But a subsequent lawsuit by
real estate developers stalled its
implementation, and SGI has been tied
up in court ever since, only recently
getting tossed back to the county from
the Nevada Supreme Court.
“(SGI) is important for the sentiment
that it represents in the community.”
GROWTH: CURSE OR
BLESSING?
While growth may be the “G” word to
many in Douglas County, the upside of it
has been shopping convenience, reduced
commute times, tax relief, more jobs and
a shift away from tourism dependence,
Holler says. And more people means more
heads to put together to fi nd an acceptable
county growth control solution should SGI
remain paralyzed by the legal system.
“We have the people capital to come
together and address our challenges,”
Holler says. “But for now, the fate of the
voter initiative is still up to the courts.”
RESIDENT VIGNETTE:
In the 38 years they’ve been married;
Dave and Kathy Whitefi eld have lived
in four states and seen a variety of
community lifestyles from rural Nebraska
to urban Arizona and California.
But when Dave, an 18-year fi eld
engineer for Bently Nevada, was invited
to relocate to the company’s Minden
headquarters in 1998, the Whitefi elds
found a place they could love right away.
“When we fi rst moved to the Carson
Valley, we were very excited to be living
so close to the mountains, Lake Tahoe and
all the scenic areas nearby.” Kathy says.
“Dave is an avid fly fisher and loves all the
nearby rivers, lakes and streams.”
Though only two of their six children are
left at home — 17-year-old twins, Bob and
Chris — family is still important, and that
means education, good medical facilities
and convenient shopping.
“We really do appreciate the good
schools and health care available here,
and lately we’ve appreciated not having to
go all the way to Reno to shop — instead
we now have our very own Target, Home
Depot and Costco,” Kathy says. “And the
new In-N-Out means no more trips to
Auburn or Placerville just to get a Double-
Double.”
As for the future, the Whitefi elds hope
growth doesn’t change their home town
too much.
“We would like to see the area continue
to grow, but in a measured way that
doesn’t negatively impact the beauty and
small town atmosphere,” Kathy says.
|
|
|
|